Hypothesis tests
Check hypotheses, test choice, test statistic, degrees of freedom, p-value, decision, and conclusion wording.
Human statistics review
Have a statistics answer from ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or another AI tool? A human reviewer can check the method, assumptions, calculations, software output, and interpretation before you rely on it.
A human review checks whether the answer fits your actual question and data. It does not promise that an AI answer is correct, hide AI use, or replace your course rules.
An answer can show polished formulas and still use the wrong test, ignore an assumption, read the wrong software table, or make a conclusion the results do not support. The review follows six checks.
Check hypotheses, test choice, test statistic, degrees of freedom, p-value, decision, and conclusion wording.
Review model choice, assumptions, coefficients, R-squared, F statistics, p-values, effect sizes, and interpretation.
Match the written answer to the relevant output and identify missing checks, warnings, or misread tables.
Check the formula, sample-versus-population choice, rounding, distribution, and meaning of the result.
The review focuses on understanding and feedback. You remain responsible for your final submission and for following your instructor’s rules on AI, tutoring, and outside assistance.
| Question | Human statistics review | AI-writing detector |
|---|---|---|
| Was the correct statistical method selected? | Checks the question, data, and method. | Does not evaluate statistical validity. |
| Do the calculations and output agree? | Compares formulas, code, values, and tables. | Does not verify the calculation. |
| Is the conclusion supported? | Checks the result in context. | Scores writing patterns, not research logic. |
| Can the student explain the answer? | Identifies concepts and questions to review. | Does not test understanding. |
An AI detector estimates writing patterns. It cannot establish whether a statistical answer is methodologically correct. Use Statskan’s six-step AI statistics verification checklist before requesting a human review.
From $15 after scope review. Suitable for one defined calculation, table, test choice, or short interpretation.
From $35 per hour. Suitable when you want to work through the reasoning and ask questions in real time.
From $75 for a defined scope. Suitable for broader SPSS, Excel, R, Stata, regression, ANOVA, or data-analysis guidance.
Starting prices are not fixed quotes. The final scope, availability, and price are confirmed after the request and files are reviewed.
No. Statskan does not help disguise AI use or bypass detection. The service checks statistical reasoning and helps you understand the work in line with your course rules.
Yes. The tool name matters less than the question, data, method, output, and interpretation. Send the complete prompt and answer so the reasoning can be checked in context.
Send the assignment question, rubric, your attempted work, the AI-assisted answer, relevant data or software output, required method, deadline, and time zone. Remove personal and confidential information first.
No. A focused review gives feedback on a defined answer or output. Live tutoring is an interactive session where you work through the method and ask questions.
No. A review can identify issues and explain the method, but grading depends on your final work, course requirements, and instructor.
Share the question, AI-assisted answer, what you have tried, and your deadline. Statskan will confirm whether the request fits, along with availability and price.
Share your question, what you have tried, and your deadline. We’ll confirm the scope, availability, and price before work begins.
Request Statistics Guidance →